This was inspired by a Guardian Australia article noting that in 75% of searches initiated by NSW police sniffer dogs over the last decade or so, people had no drugs on them (70,913 out of 94,535 searches, which is a lot of false positives*). So not only are they expensive (~$5M per year), and dangerous, they are also useless (and it's not even a new issue, as this article from 2016 shows). Pill testing is the way to go. Anyway, see if you can perform better than a NSW police sniffer dog.
Select the people you think might have drugs:
You
Correct:
False Positives:
vs
the Dog
Correct:
False Positives:
-
Out of the so far you average false positives, while the sniffer dog's average is (a lower rate of false positives is good)
